Extreme Budget Illogic At the CBO

By PoetCSW -
I've noted this issue repeatedly: health care reform will not and cannot reduce federal spending. Only in the absurd world of Congress can you pretend "The cuts are coming!" year after year, always delaying them, and yet count those "cuts" as savings. Do you really believe Congress is going to cut payments to doctors by 20% or more? Do you really believe Congress is going to increase taxes on union health plans 20-50% in four years?

But, as long as Congress claims it is going to cut, the CBO has to pretend the cuts will happen. Viola! Health care reform cuts the deficit! No, it does not. It will not, it cannot.

Read this at Real Clear Politics:

Extreme Budget Illogic At the CBO

It's simple: the CBO has to use the fake numbers provided by Congress. If the Congress claimed taxes will be 100% and no jobs will be lost, the CBO would have to use those assumptions. That's how the CBO functions — lots of garbage in, tons of garbage out. Sadly, the CBO knows this, so every report from the CBO includes warnings that the estimates are unlikely to be accurate. Those admissions are what the press should report.

We could reform the health care and insurance markets. We could, but we won't.

Some quick cost control measures:

1. End direct employer-provided insurance, making employees pay for insurance. This would make insurance both portable and a real expense to employees.

2. Allow insurance purchases and transfers across state lines. This does mean national insurance standards instead of the state-by-state patchwork of mandates and compliance rules. One set of rules, one large insurance market. Insurance would be interstate commerce, definitely, and therefore a federal concern. Yes, it's a compromise of libertarian ideals, but the trade is a competitive market.

3. Tort reform! I wouldn't mind banning the commercials for lawsuits against drug companies, device manufacturers, and doctors, too. In return, let's also end direct advertising of most drugs. I'll make the compromise, even though it goes against my libertarian impulses. Drugs are regulated as interstate commerce, so tell the medical companies: we'll improve safety and testing standards, but you'll have less advertising in return for legal liability limits.

The list could be much longer, but I wouldn't need 2000 pages to develop real health care reform.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The 90% Tax Rate Myth

By PoetCSW -
Image
[NOTE Augusut 8, 2017:  The marginal and effective U.S. Tax rates mentioned in this 2011 post have been supported by research conducted by Thomas Piketty (Paris School of Economics), Emmanuel Saez (UC Berkeley and NBER), and Gabriel Zucman (UC Berkeley and NBER). These economic researchers are well-respected by progressives. Data are data, though we differ on interpretations. "Income" vs. "Wealth" presents much of the challenge, as wealth accumulates but is not taxed in the United States. Distributional National Accounts:  Methods and Estimates for the United States published July 6, 2017, includes the following table: As the table shows, the effective tax rate for the top 1 percent peaked at 45 percent of income in 1944-45. Unfortunately, the overall revenue intake of the United States kept growing and the burden has been falling most on the bottom 50 percent. Tax increases on the middle and lower classes reduce potential economic growth since these individ
Read more

Call it 'Too Depressed to Blog'

By PoetCSW -
Though the contemporary Republican Party has never been libertarian enough for me or many others focused on economic issues, we at least imagined the GOP would lead a President Trump, who came into office with no governing experience and a platform that was populist and nationalist. The GOP has failed to do much practical at all. If you, like me, at least hoped Trump would be contained by party orthodoxy, the year has been nothing but disappointment after disappointment. Civil Rights: Hard to think of anything the GOP or Pres. Trump has proposed with which I agree, from gender issues to voting rights, the GOP is allowing Trump to lead on these subjects — in the wrong direction. Gay marriage should never have been a national issue. Private matters are private, between consenting adults. The libertarians and social conservatives will always be in conflict on these issues. On voting rights, I am okay with a basic national ID standard, as is being implemented for the TSA via ne
Read more

Krugman Misleads Again with 'Moochers Against Welfare'

By PoetCSW -
Paul Krugman, unfortunately, is the dominant voice among left-leaning economists. His columns are too often a sad example of what passes for great intellectual insight from the Coastal Elites in today's United States. Consider this series of logical leaps: Moochers Against Welfare   By PAUL KRUGMAN Published: February 16, 2012  [The] regions in which government programs account for the largest share of personal income — are precisely the regions electing those severe conservatives. Wasn't Red America supposed to be the land of traditional values, where people don't eat Thai food and don't rely on handouts? Krugman is a master of misleading arguments, resorting to a mix of straw man arguments and ad hominem insults that are meant to belittle conservative voters. Why the use of the word "moochers" for people on aid? If the goal is to make a point that people on aid are not  moochers, Krugman fails. Instead, his use comes across as insulting. A moocher
Read more