Obama versus ATMs and Kiosks

By PoetCSW -
Beatable, And He Knows It - Investors.com: "'The other thing that happened,' the president claimed in an NBC 'Today Show' interview Tuesday, 'is there are some structural issues with our economy where a lot of businesses have learned to become much more efficient with a lot fewer workers.

'You see it when you go to a bank and you use an ATM. You don't go to a bank teller. Or you go to the airport and you're using a kiosk instead of checking in at the gate.'"
I've written about automation and job changes in several blog posts. We gain from technology, particularly in terms of human safety and life expectancy. Automation in factories has made factories safer. Cars replacing horses made cities less prone to disease outbreaks. Factory medications are more controlled than the old "apothecary" mixtures. Generally, automation is a net positive.

Also, there will always be a market for those things that are handcrafted by true artisans. Yes, factory automation has allowed more of us to afford nice furniture and cars, but if you have money you can still buy handcrafted woodwork and a Rolls Royce.

ATMs are not the enemy. I love that I can use an ATM after work, before work, or on holidays. That beats my old bank's hours when I was a college student. The bank opened at 9:30 and closed by 5:00 each day, with no weekend hours. I don't want to go back to those days.

Mr. President, find another explanation for unemployment. You know, like the mess created by the GSEs and mortgage backed securities. The endless environmental lawsuits blocking major infrastructure rebuilding. The NLRB lawsuit against Boeing's new South Carolina plant. How about Dodd-Frank, yet more SEC uncertainty, and everything Elizabeth Warren says? Don't forget uncertainty over tax policy and health care "reform" in the future. Also, the worries about our federal debt and the European debt crisis.

Yes, there are plenty of explanations for slow job growth beyond ATMs and kiosks.

Then again, this is the president who is lauding the return of the "U.S. Big Three" while Chrysler and GM actually did go bankrupt. Chrysler, by the way, is no longer a U.S. company, Mr. President. Or did you forget that Fiat is Italian?

No, we've lost jobs for a lot of reasons. Not the least are the policies implemented by both political parties. When politicians can celebrate a "bailout" that resulted in parts of GM and all of Chrysler being sold to foreign companies, you know they've lost touch with the American workers and employers.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The 90% Tax Rate Myth

By PoetCSW -
Image
[NOTE Augusut 8, 2017:  The marginal and effective U.S. Tax rates mentioned in this 2011 post have been supported by research conducted by Thomas Piketty (Paris School of Economics), Emmanuel Saez (UC Berkeley and NBER), and Gabriel Zucman (UC Berkeley and NBER). These economic researchers are well-respected by progressives. Data are data, though we differ on interpretations. "Income" vs. "Wealth" presents much of the challenge, as wealth accumulates but is not taxed in the United States. Distributional National Accounts:  Methods and Estimates for the United States published July 6, 2017, includes the following table: As the table shows, the effective tax rate for the top 1 percent peaked at 45 percent of income in 1944-45. Unfortunately, the overall revenue intake of the United States kept growing and the burden has been falling most on the bottom 50 percent. Tax increases on the middle and lower classes reduce potential economic growth since...
Read more

Call it 'Too Depressed to Blog'

By PoetCSW -
Though the contemporary Republican Party has never been libertarian enough for me or many others focused on economic issues, we at least imagined the GOP would lead a President Trump, who came into office with no governing experience and a platform that was populist and nationalist. The GOP has failed to do much practical at all. If you, like me, at least hoped Trump would be contained by party orthodoxy, the year has been nothing but disappointment after disappointment. Civil Rights: Hard to think of anything the GOP or Pres. Trump has proposed with which I agree, from gender issues to voting rights, the GOP is allowing Trump to lead on these subjects — in the wrong direction. Gay marriage should never have been a national issue. Private matters are private, between consenting adults. The libertarians and social conservatives will always be in conflict on these issues. On voting rights, I am okay with a basic national ID standard, as is being implemented for the TSA via ne...
Read more

High Taxes = Wealthy Communities

By PoetCSW -
One of the paradoxes progressives use to challenge libertarian ideals and conservative tax policies is that the wealthiest communities and cities have some of the highest local tax rates in the nation. Cities like New York and San Francisco are obvious examples, as are the suburban areas around Chicago, Los Angeles, and Washington, D.C. (also known for its concentration of Super Zips). High local taxes usually correspond to school spending, which is funded in most states through property taxes. Local schools are almost private academies in many states and counties, particularly in areas without a history of private schools. My wife and I are an example of this high-tax and wealth paradox, made worse by the natural sorting that occurs among classes. And, because wealth is generationally transmitted through culture, education, and property, this also contributes to racial sorting in most nations (as seen by studies of "egalitarian" Europe). We live in a single-entrance,...
Read more